FOR JONBENET RAMSEY

THE JONBENET RAMSEY MURDER LIBRARY


This is the mouth of a six year old child.

THIS IS AN OPINION PAGE. IT IS MY OPINION AND MINE ALONE. I HAVE FOLLOWED THIS
INVESTIGATION OF THE SLAUGHTER OF A LITTLE GIRL THAT I NEVER HAD THE GOOD FORTUNE
TO MEET AS SHE STRUGGLED TO BE A CHILD.

IT'S BEEN OVER THREE YEARS NOW, AND NOT A DAY GOES BY THAT I DON'T THINK OF HER.
I HAVE ASKED MYSELF MANY TIMES,
" WHY?".
I HEAR OVER AND OVER AGAIN THAT THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN
ARE ABUSED AND/OR MURDERED.


These are the eyes of a six year old child.

WHY IS JONBENET DIFFERENT

Because she was a six year old beauty queen? NO
Because she was beautiful? NO
Because she was rich? NO

JONBENET RAMSEY IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE I HAVE COME TO KNOW HER PARENTS


THE PEOPLE OF THE LIE

John Ramsey:
"I can tell you as her father that if I even had a minute suspicion that anybody was harming my daughter,
I would have been horrified."

HORRIFIED!
This is the statement of JonBenet's father. Where are his feelings toward the individual person who violated and slaughtered JonBenet?

Patsy Ramsey
from the book, Death of Innocence:

"How can I help people as the Lord challenges me to do when I don't know who the needy are? Nobody knows me?
Eventually I prayed, God, I will do whatever you want me to do
...but nobody knows who I am."

It's interesting to note that this passage in the book appears with a question mark after the statement, "Nobody knows me?"
Is it possible that Patsy is asking the question, is there anyone who doesn't know ME?

I have come to know the reasons why JonBenet was never a child.

I remember a movie telling the story of a woman on trial for her life for killing a man
that was attempting to rape her.
She sat on the witness stand and answered questions regarding her experience with incest.
The attorney askes her why she chose never to have children of her own. Her answer haunts me to this day.

"I don't believe in childhood."

I often think if JonBenet had the chance to grow into a beautiful woman,
she would have given the same answer.

DETECTIVE LOU SMIT AND THE "STUN GUN" THAT NEVER WAS


Thank you Mrs. Brady for this great photo

Here you see JonBenet's "Potholder Weaving Loom" as it rested on her bedside dresser.
It sat to the left of the dresser, right near JonBenet's bed headboard drapery that was found in disarray. The "hairties" are are shown in the crime scene photos of the bedroom.
WHERE IS THE LOOM?

Sometimes the most experienced, intuitive, and intelligent make grave mistakes.
Detective Lou Smit may very well have made a devastating miscalulation.

My personal message to Detective Lou Smit:

I quote from
CRIME CLASSIFICATION MANUAL
John E. Douglas, Ann W. Burgess, Allen G. Brugess, Robert K. Ressler:

THE ASSESSMENT PHASE

"Another pitfall that obscures these important details is the inablilty of the investigator to achieve a comfortable distance from the crime.
Identification with the victim, perhaps relating the victim to a family member, prevents detachment from the crime, and judgment may become clouded by emotion."

In the Ramsey Book, Death Of Innocence, Detective Lou Smit is quoted as saying the following to John Ramsey.

"I need to be able to know that this important information is kept in a limited circle."........When we find the killer or killers, it's important thet certain facts be known only to us and the killer. That's how we will know we've got our man."
"....Do you know what a stun gun is?"
"A stun Gun?" I frowned"
"You understand what I'm talking about,?" Lou asked."
"Sort of, I said.............I don't have any idea what one looks like."

John this is what a stun gun looks like.

John Ramsey reports in the book that he visited a spy shop that sold items for security and monitoring. After window shopping at the merchandise in the store John reports that the clerk gave him a video tape catalogue to take home. According to John Ramsey he never looked at the video and states that he later found that the tape was made in Spanish.

John Ramsey, after, visiting that shop that carrried, "everything under the sun", had no idea what a stun gun looked like. John tells us that he later learned why Lou Smit was asking these questions.

Smit noticed two sets of marks on JonBenet's body.

John and Patsy presented this drawing to Barbara Walters during their recent interview.

Smit hit the jackpot. All they had to do was re-examine JonBenet to confirm that the marks showed signs of an electrical charge and matched Smit's Stun Gun.
That was not to be

John Ramsey while desperately attempting to remove himself and his wife as a suspect so that they could continue to look for the "real killer" gave this explanation.

John Ramsey would not authorize the exhumation of his daughter. He explains, "because the exhumation didn't occur, Smit couldn't obtain the conslusive statement he was seeking."

BARBARA WALTERS:
" Why wasn’t the body exhumed? "

JOHN RAMSEY;
" (PAUSE) Don’t know why the Police didn’t consider that. Uh we were asked… when this theory first surfaced about a Stun gun that if the body were exhumed… it could be proved conclusively but it had to be done fairly quickly. This was… within months of when we’d just buried JonBenet. And I, as her father, could not bring myself to do that. I had laid my child to rest. She was at peace. And that was a that decision I couldn’t make. "

BARBARA WALTERS:

" Even though it might have cleared you? "

John, the important question is why didn't YOU consider that .
JonBenet's body remains undisturbed.
John and Patsy Ramsey are still searching for the Killer. The latest press report that I read mentioned them
hiding in the basement of John's corporate pilot's home, while the press interviewed the owner.

It must have been "delicious". Another win for John and Patsy Ramsey in "Catch Me If You Can."

Photo of the "Stretching Loopers" that come with the House Craft Weaving Loom

These are the objects that Patsy Ramsey told us were scattered about JonBenet's bedroom floor.
Were they were mistaken for hair ties? I believe the autopsy report reveals that one of them was used to dress her hair along with traditional hair bands.

STUN GUN TESTS ON POLICE OFFICERS

THANK YOU "janphi" OF JUSTICE WATCH DISCUSSION FORUM FOR YOUR RESEARCH HERE.

[The test]

2. Physiologic Measurements:
a. Skin - Twenty 21-50 year old male police officer volunteers were exposed to 3 second bursts of the pulse generator output delivered to the volar aspect of one forearm. A non-electric pressure injury of a similar degree was applied to the contralateral arm. These sessions took place during regularly scheduled training programs specifically related to familiarization with the devices. Color photographs of the exposed sites were taken at 1 and 10 minutes post shock and again at 24 hours.

[The results]

2. Physiologic measurements
a. Skin - All twenty subjects exhibited the typical "signature response", specifically a punctate reddening of the skin at 10 minutes post shock limited to a 3-5mm diameter circle directly under each probe. Five out of 20 showed small wheals at the stimulus site. All of these hive-like elevations had disappeared at 1 to 2 hours. Only one case, a man of mediterranean ancestry, showed residual markings at 24 hours and these were gone in 2 days. No burns or other permanent markings were ever noted.

Exerpt from the Autopsy Report:

REMAINDER OF EXTERNAL EXAMINATION:"The unembalmed, well developed nourished caucasian female body measures 47 inches in length and weighs an estimated 45 pounds. The scalp is covered by long blonde hair which is fixed in two ponytails, one on top of the head secured by a cloth hair tie and blue elastic band, and one in the lower back of the head secured by a blue elastic band. No scalp trauma is identified. The external auditory canals are patent and free of blood.The eyes are green and the pupils "

The scalp is covered by long blonde hair which is fixed in two ponytails, one on top of the head secured by a cloth hair tie and blue elastic band, and one in the lower back of the head secured by a blue elastic band.

I submit that the ponytail on the top of JonBenet's head tied with the cloth hair tieis secured with one of the loom "stretching Loops" that you see above.

If that is true, is likely that JonBenet's hair was washed and dressed in her bedroom before she was taken to the basement.
I do have reason to believe that. The loom fabric pieces were scattered across the floor in JonBenet's bedroom
and
Patsy Ramsey made another one of, what I believe are attempts at exculpatory statements. During an interview regarding the soon to be released Death of Innocence.

She produced a container of shampoo from her purse, showed it to the press and mentioned that she was changing brands. The police must know the brand of shampoo that last washed JonBenet's hair, and Patsy was going to make sure they knew that wasn't the brand she used. She used the brand produced at the interview. Patsy and John Ramsey have a huge problem with their explanations and answers.

NO ONE ASKED THE QUESTION

The evidence listed on the return of the search warrants for the ramsey home includes a hairbrush taken from Patsy Ramsey's personal items.
Where is the hair brush from JonBenet's bathroom?
Hair found in brush in Mrs. Ramsey's bathroom (53KKY)

Thank you "Censusgrrl" of Justice Watch discussion forum for your help with the loom pictures shown in clear detail with the tape measure.

Notice that the tops of the loom prongs are not pointed, they have a flat effect.

The loom post marks shown on my arm are 450 mm center to center.
The marks measure 1/16X1/8 inch.


Artist drawing of the "Stun Gun Marks" found on JonBenet's body. A photo of the loom prongs.
Thank you "Cutter" of the Justice Watch Discussion Forum for your help with the artist drawing picture.

During an interview with John and Patsy Ramsay, Barbara Walters made the following observation:

" Marks on JonBenét’s face and back could have been made by a stun gun. Arapahoe County Coroner Michael Doberson said that after examining Smit’s photos of the wounds he agreed that a stun gun might have been used to subdue the girl. But Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner said there is evidence contradicting Smit’s theory about the stun gun. Smit noticed marks, reproduced in this sketch, on the autopsy photographs of JonBenet’s body. The autopsy report referred to them simply as “abrasions,” but they reminded Smit of a previous stun gun case. There were two sets of marks on JonBenet’s body, and when Smit calibrated their measurements, he felt they matched up with this popular stun gun model, the Air Taser."

These two corner prongs of the loom have been highlighted with black felt tip pen to show their location. These prongs were colored with black felt tip pen ink before they were pressed on my arm for the photo below.
Please note that these are not bruises shown on my arm.

The loom prong impression left when the corner of the loom was pressed on my forearm.

PATSY RAMSEY:

" The Police don’t like that theory because it doesn’t match up with the parents did it. If the parents wanted to bring their child to a basement quietly they wouldn’t have to use a Stun gun. They would just say, come on, we’re gonna go to the basement… for a surprise or something. You know that doesn’t fit their theory that John or I were involved. "

I don't care for Smit's theory either.

This page is respectfully dedicated to Susan Bennett, who has provided me with more information than
She'll ever know.

Ruth Gerstenkorn
E-Mail me with thoughts and questions

Last Modified April 3, 2000 Ruth Gerstenkorn

Last Modified August 27, 2001 ACandyRose©
On behalf of Ruthee and in her memory
http://www.acandyrose.com
acandyrose@netzero.net